<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Episode 168: Amazing Discoveries</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thefitcast.com/episode-168-amazing-discoveries/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thefitcast.com/episode-168-amazing-discoveries</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 28 Aug 2010 15:40:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Leigh Peele</title>
		<link>http://thefitcast.com/episode-168-amazing-discoveries/comment-page-1#comment-152531</link>
		<dc:creator>Leigh Peele</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Feb 2010 04:51:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thefitcast.com/?p=1910#comment-152531</guid>
		<description>I wont speak for Kevin but I think both me and him were talking about it in terms of the full strength program and the high volume of doing that aspect of the program. 

It is a valid statement you make though, but I think it is more a different view me and Kevin were making on the program he had just finished in relation to fat loss. Even that I said you could do it, but it may be to taxing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wont speak for Kevin but I think both me and him were talking about it in terms of the full strength program and the high volume of doing that aspect of the program. </p>
<p>It is a valid statement you make though, but I think it is more a different view me and Kevin were making on the program he had just finished in relation to fat loss. Even that I said you could do it, but it may be to taxing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Luke</title>
		<link>http://thefitcast.com/episode-168-amazing-discoveries/comment-page-1#comment-152383</link>
		<dc:creator>Luke</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Feb 2010 04:32:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thefitcast.com/?p=1910#comment-152383</guid>
		<description>I agree with Mark.  I&#039;m using a two day per week 5/3/1 program for fat loss right now with some great results so far.  Instead of the 5 sets of 10 for the accessory work, I&#039;m doing some short, lower volume timed circuits.  My lifts are still going up, and my weight is coming down.  I love it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with Mark.  I&#8217;m using a two day per week 5/3/1 program for fat loss right now with some great results so far.  Instead of the 5 sets of 10 for the accessory work, I&#8217;m doing some short, lower volume timed circuits.  My lifts are still going up, and my weight is coming down.  I love it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark</title>
		<link>http://thefitcast.com/episode-168-amazing-discoveries/comment-page-1#comment-152379</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Feb 2010 01:01:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thefitcast.com/?p=1910#comment-152379</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m going to have to disagree with the comments about 5/3/1 not being suited for fat loss because it&#039;s so high volume. The fact is that 5/3/1 is utterly scalable to whatever you want to do. Did you read the sample setup called &quot;I&#039;m Not Doing Jack Shit?&quot; That&#039;s the ultimate in low volume - just your main lift for the day, and that&#039;s it. Hell, the highest volume on the main lift is only 3x5. What&#039;s high volume about that? In addition, all of the accessory work can be scaled. Just because it says you can do up to 5 sets doesn&#039;t mean that you have to do 5 sets.

So, yeah....sorry, but I have to disagree with the comments about this program.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m going to have to disagree with the comments about 5/3/1 not being suited for fat loss because it&#8217;s so high volume. The fact is that 5/3/1 is utterly scalable to whatever you want to do. Did you read the sample setup called &#8220;I&#8217;m Not Doing Jack Shit?&#8221; That&#8217;s the ultimate in low volume &#8211; just your main lift for the day, and that&#8217;s it. Hell, the highest volume on the main lift is only 3&#215;5. What&#8217;s high volume about that? In addition, all of the accessory work can be scaled. Just because it says you can do up to 5 sets doesn&#8217;t mean that you have to do 5 sets.</p>
<p>So, yeah&#8230;.sorry, but I have to disagree with the comments about this program.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
